The New Rules of Getting Away

Sustainability, Security, and Cost Are Reshaping Travel
Written by Vicki Damon

Global tourism has climbed back past pre-pandemic revenue levels, and forecasts point to continued expansion in the years ahead. But the sector reaching those numbers again does not mean it has returned to business as usual.

Behind the headline growth figures sits an industry recalibrating on several fronts at once: travellers are rethinking where and how they spend their money; governments are tightening the rules around who can cross their borders and on what terms; and destinations from Venice to Kyoto are openly rationing the very demand that keeps their economies afloat. For operators, planners, and everyone working across the travel and tourism supply chain, 2026 is shaping up to be a year defined less by simple recovery and more by adaptation.

For years, “sustainable travel” functioned mostly as a marketing category, a badge hotels and tour operators could apply to a handful of green initiatives. That framing is shifting. Overtourism has become one of the defining pressures on the sector this year, and a wide range of governments have moved from talking about visitor caps to enforcing them. Venice has required QR-coded access for day trippers, Santorini has introduced a daily visitor cap, and Amsterdam has cut cruise calls and relocated docking further from its historic core to reduce pollution, noise, and crowding.

Barcelona has raised its combined hotel tax to up to €12 per person, per night, and doubled its nightly rate for five-star properties. Japan is tripling its international departure tax in July, alongside sharply higher lodging taxes in Kyoto, Hokkaido, and Hiroshima. Norway, a relative newcomer to this trend, is introducing a municipal tourism tax of up to three percent on overnight stays this summer to relieve pressure on its fjords and the Lofoten Islands.

The scale of these changes marks a genuine shift in strategy rather than a series of one-off fee hikes. Industry analysis of the trend frames the 2026 tax increases as a deliberate pivot toward high-value tourism, driven by overtourism concerns and environmental targets. Destinations are increasingly judging success by the value tourism delivers to residents and local infrastructure, not simply the volume of arrivals passing through.

That has direct consequences for how travellers plan trips and for how travel businesses need to position their offerings. Two-thirds of travellers say they would avoid a popular destination if they expected it to be crowded, and nearly half now actively support incentives for off-peak travel, according to Simon-Kucher’s Global Travel Trends 2026. The rise of the so-called “anti-tourism” traveller, someone deliberately seeking out quieter, less-visited alternatives to hotspot cities, is feeding a corresponding rise in interest around secondary destinations, with search interest in emerging spots now climbing noticeably faster than in a region’s established hubs.

Climate is compounding this shift. Changing weather patterns are steering more travellers toward off-season trips and destinations with milder, more predictable climates, adding an environmental dimension to decisions that were once made purely on cost or convenience. For operators, that means the destinations and travel windows considered “shoulder season” only a few years ago may need to be re-evaluated as peak product going forward.

None of this means eco-sensitive travel is a niche pursuit confined to a small segment of conscientious travellers. It is increasingly the default lens through which destinations are managing capacity, setting prices, and shaping the visitor experience, whether individual travellers are actively seeking sustainability or not.

If sustainability pressures are reshaping demand, geopolitical volatility is reshaping supply, specifically which regions and nationalities can move freely at all. Security intelligence firm S-RM notes that rising political tensions in various regions have driven new visa requirements and travel restrictions, while military tensions and open conflict elsewhere have triggered regional airspace closures, diverted flight routes, and evacuations. The firm points to a rise in disruptive incidents linked to Russian activity, including drone sightings that have triggered temporary airport closures across Europe, as an increasing factor affecting European travel specifically.

The United States has been a major source of this volatility in 2026. It has fully or partially suspended entry and visa issuance for nationals of 39 countries, including broad suspensions for 19 nations and narrower restrictions on visitor, student, exchange, and immigrant visas for 19 more.

The State Department’s Worldwide Caution, issued in July over heightened tensions in the Middle East, adds another layer of uncertainty for both leisure and business travellers. Travel industry groups have warned that these measures risk deterring international visitors and denting revenue in sectors that depend heavily on inbound tourism.

Europe, meanwhile, is tightening its own systems in the name of security and efficiency rather than restriction. The European Entry/Exit System, which replaces passport stamps with fingerprint and facial recognition data, becomes fully operational in April, making overstays past the 90/180-day limit far easier to detect. The European Travel Information and Authorisation System follows later in the year, requiring pre-travel authorization for visa-exempt visitors from the U.K., the U.S., Canada, and Australia among others. Visa rules are changing quickly enough in 2026 that keeping track of the requirements has itself become part of the planning for individual travellers and corporate travel managers alike.

For an industry that runs on predictability, booking windows, and cancellation policies, this level of regulatory flux is a genuine operational headache. Even the anticipation of new restrictions can shift booking behaviour before any rule changes, as travellers and travel managers alike hedge toward destinations with more stable entry conditions.

Corporate travel budgets are rising regardless, projected to reach $1.69 trillion globally in 2026, but travel teams are having to build far more contingency and verification into every itinerary than they did even two years ago.

Cost sits at the intersection of both trends above, and it is arguably the pressure travellers feel most directly. Tourist taxes alone can now add hundreds of dollars to a two-week, multi-city trip, a cost that rarely appears transparently at the point of booking the way flights or hotel rates do. That has already begun to nudge behaviour toward what one industry report calls “destination dupes,” lower-cost or lower-profile alternatives to the cities absorbing the heaviest new levies.

At the same time, spending on travel itself is not contracting. American Express’s 2026 Global Travel Trends Report found that 40 percent of respondents plan to spend more on travel this year than last, and 74 percent of Millennials and Gen Z surveyed describe travel as a non-negotiable expense rather than a discretionary one. “Travellers are being incredibly intentional about how they spend their vacation time,” says Audrey Hendley, President of American Express Travel. A meaningful share of younger travellers say they would even accept a job with fewer benefits in exchange for greater flexibility to travel.

That intentionality is producing a split within the travel market rather than a uniform one. Deloitte’s 2026 Travel Industry Outlook identifies a bifurcation inside the luxury segment itself: ultra-luxury properties remain largely insulated from economic headwinds, while mass-market luxury and premium cabin upgrades are showing early signs of softness as more affluent travellers turn price-conscious. Budget-conscious travellers are not disappearing; they are simply becoming more deliberate about where their money goes, prioritizing experiences and flexibility over volume or status.

Technology is playing an increasingly direct role in how travellers manage this squeeze. Nearly a quarter of travellers now use generative AI tools to plan trips, per Deloitte’s research, three times the share who did in 2022, even as the industry works to connect AI-assisted planning more seamlessly with actual booking and content. Google’s AI Mode now assembles full day-by-day itineraries complete with hotel recommendations and loyalty options, and hotels are using AI to personalize everything from room preferences to in-stay amenities before a guest even arrives.

For cost-conscious travellers, that same technology is also becoming a tool for finding value, comparing properties, surfacing lesser-known destinations, and building itineraries that avoid the newest layers of tourist taxation.

Running alongside the financial and regulatory pressures is a less tangible but equally consistent theme: travellers want their trips to mean something. Wellness tourism is projected to surpass $1 trillion globally this year.

American Express’s research found that a large majority of respondents believe the skills or experiences they gain while travelling stay with them longer than any souvenir would. Nearly nine in 10 global respondents say they like to leave room in their itinerary for unplanned local discoveries, and roughly three-quarters say they are likely to try something outside their comfort zone while away from home, a figure that climbs even higher among Millennial and Gen Z travellers.

This pursuit of authenticity dovetails naturally with the anti-tourism trend discussed above: travellers avoiding overcrowded hotspots are often the same travellers seeking deeper, more localized experiences rather than checklist sightseeing. For operators, that suggests genuine opportunity in secondary destinations and community-based tourism, provided the infrastructure and staffing exist to support a more personalized style of service.

One further trend deserves mention alongside the headline pressures of sustainability, geopolitics, and cost: the composition of leadership within the sector itself. The appointment of Shaikha Al Nowais as Secretary-General of UN Tourism marks the first time a woman has led the organization, and it arrives alongside a broader recognition that hospitality, an industry built on people and local communities, has historically underrepresented women in senior roles relative to its workforce.

Julia Simpson, President and CEO of the World Travel & Tourism Council since 2021, continues to shape policy across sustainability and workforce development for a forum representing 200 CEOs across airlines, hotels, cruise lines, and travel agencies.

Whether such a shift in leadership translates into faster progress on the sector’s other challenges remains to be seen, but it is a structural change worth tracking alongside the more immediately visible trends.

No single trend defines travel and tourism this year. Instead, the sector is navigating three pressures simultaneously: destinations imposing real limits on visitor volume in the name of sustainability; governments tightening and complicating cross-border movement for security and political reasons; and travellers recalibrating how and where they spend against a backdrop of rising, less transparent costs.

Businesses that treat these as separate, isolated issues risk being caught out by all three at once. Those that build flexibility into pricing and traveller communication while leaning on technology to personalize the experience without adding friction stand the best chance of turning a genuinely complex operating environment into a competitive advantage.

AUTHOR

More Articles